Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs RKCIX
FSWFX vs RKCIX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs RKCIX
FSWFX vs RKCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. RKCIX (69.6M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than RKCIX: FSWFX (0.79) vs RKCIX (0.03). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RKCIX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RKCIX (5 years). RKCIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RKCIX (25.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RKCIX: FSWFX (250) vs RKCIX (1000000). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. RKCIX (1.21).
| FSWFX | RKCIX | FSWFX / RKCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.99 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.182 | 8.324 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 69.6M | 135,489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.03 | 3,082% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 1.21 | 1,168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.11 | 16.22 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement