FSWFX (89B) and RLLGX (89B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLLGX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: RLLGX (0.90) vs FSWFX (0.84). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RLLGX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RLLGX (17 years). FSWFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). FSWFX (41.00) and RLLGX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSWFX (250) and RLLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLLGX (15.82) and FSWFX (15.52) have marching annual gain over last year. RLLGX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. FSWFX (-1.28).

	FSWFX	RLLGX	FSWFX / RLLGX
Total Expense Ratio	0.76	0.65	117%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.76	0.65	117%
Fund Existence	6 years	17 years	-
Gain YTD	14.779	14.864	99%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	250	250	100%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	89B	89B	100%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.84	0.90	93%
Returns for 1 year	15.52	15.82	98%
Returns for 3 years	41.73	42.42	98%
Returns for 5 years	-1.28	-0.62	205%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	90.37	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
LRSYX	24.15	0.29	+1.22%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value I
TMAPX	58.79	0.52	+0.89%
Touchstone Mid Cap A
GSMCX	41.71	0.21	+0.51%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
EIERX	23.73	0.09	+0.38%
Eaton Vance Stock I
JDBAX	50.17	N/A	N/A
Janus Henderson Balanced A