Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs RLLGX
FSWFX vs RLLGX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs RLLGX
FSWFX vs RLLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX (94.3B) and RLLGX (94.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLLGX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: RLLGX (0.85) vs FSWFX (0.79). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RLLGX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RLLGX (17 years). FSWFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). FSWFX (41.00) and RLLGX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSWFX (250) and RLLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLLGX (14.42) and FSWFX (14.13) have marching annual gain over last year. RLLGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.08 vs. FSWFX (-2.71).
| FSWFX | RLLGX | FSWFX / RLLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.182 | 12.243 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 94.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 14.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.11 | 31.71 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | -2.08 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement