Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs RSLBX
FSWFX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs RSLBX
FSWFX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX (91.5B) and RSLBX (91.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSWFX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FSWFX (0.85) vs RSLBX (0.18). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX (41.00) and RSLBX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSWFX (250) and RSLBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.19 vs. RSLBX (22.00). FSWFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.39 vs. RSLBX (-6.61).
| FSWFX | RSLBX | FSWFX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.74 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.74 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.982 | 16.431 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 91.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.18 | 479% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.19 | 22.00 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 38.68 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.39 | -6.61 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement