FSWFX (89B) and RSLCX (89B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSWFX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: FSWFX (0.84) vs RSLCX (0.44). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RSLCX (24 years). RSLCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX (41.00) and RSLCX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSWFX (250) and RSLCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.85 vs. RSLCX (13.87). FSWFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.26 vs. RSLCX (-4.80).

	FSWFX	RSLCX	FSWFX / RSLCX
Total Expense Ratio	0.76	1.30	58%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.76	1.30	58%
Fund Existence	6 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	14.793	14.395	103%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	250	250	100%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	89B	89B	100%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.84	0.44	191%
Returns for 1 year	14.85	13.87	107%
Returns for 3 years	42.18	39.45	107%
Returns for 5 years	-1.26	-4.80	26%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	76.59	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
HRTVX	63.87	N/A	N/A
Heartland Value Investor
HUSIX	33.58	N/A	N/A
Huber Small Cap Value Inv
LRSVX	24.49	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R6
MIEKX	44.00	N/A	N/A
MFS International Equity I
CGIIX	56.50	-0.02	-0.04%
Calamos Growth & Income I