Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs RSLCX
FSWFX vs RSLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs RSLCX
FSWFX vs RSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSWFX vs. RSLCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSWFX is a Buy and RSLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX (91.4B) and RSLCX (91.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSWFX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: FSWFX (0.82) vs RSLCX (0.43). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RSLCX (24 years). RSLCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX (41.00) and RSLCX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSWFX (250) and RSLCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. RSLCX (10.55). FSWFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.27 vs. RSLCX (-10.59).
| FSWFX | RSLCX | FSWFX / RSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.30 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.30 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 12.985 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 91.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.43 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 10.55 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.35 | 36.66 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.27 | -10.59 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement