Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs RSLDX
FSWFX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs RSLDX
FSWFX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX (94.3B) and RSLDX (94.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSWFX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: FSWFX (0.79) vs RSLDX (0.75). FSWFX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: FSWFX (6 years) vs RSLDX (11 years). RSLDX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX (41.00) and RSLDX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSWFX (250) and RSLDX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSWFX (14.13) and RSLDX (14.11) have marching annual gain over last year. FSWFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. RSLDX (-3.00).
| FSWFX | RSLDX | FSWFX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.80 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.80 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.182 | 12.159 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 94.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 14.11 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.11 | 30.97 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | -3.00 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement