Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYJX vs RNWHX
FSYJX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSYJX vs RNWHX
FSYJX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSYJX (39.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSYJX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FSYJX (0.79). FSYJX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSYJX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSYJX (3.60) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSYJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSYJX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSYJX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSYJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.75 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| FSYJX | RNWHX | FSYJX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.60 | 0.72 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.266 | 18.743 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.75 | 31.15 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.24 | 57.37 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement