Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYNX vs RNWHX
FSYNX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSYNX vs RNWHX
FSYNX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSYNX (39.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSYNX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FSYNX (0.48). FSYNX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSYNX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSYNX (4.27) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSYNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSYNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSYNX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSYNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.10 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| FSYNX | RNWHX | FSYNX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.72 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.27 | 0.72 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.064 | 18.743 | 166% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.15 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.10 | 31.15 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.38 | 57.37 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement