Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYNX vs RNWHX
FSYNX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSYNX vs RNWHX
FSYNX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FSYNX (44.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSYNX: RNWHX (1.14) vs FSYNX (0.49). FSYNX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSYNX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSYNX (4.27) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSYNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSYNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSYNX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSYNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.21 vs. RNWHX (19.47).
| FSYNX | RNWHX | FSYNX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.72 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.27 | 0.72 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.021 | 12.651 | 198% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.14 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.21 | 19.47 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.06 | 43.67 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.04 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement