Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSZIX vs RNWBX
FSZIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FSZIX vs RNWBX
FSZIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. FSZIX (39.5M). FSZIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FSZIX (0.79) vs RNWBX (0.41). FSZIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FSZIX (4 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FSZIX (3.78) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). FSZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FSZIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FSZIX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FSZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.48 vs. RNWBX (28.07).
| FSZIX | RNWBX | FSZIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.78 | 1.66 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.181 | 16.252 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.41 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.48 | 28.07 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.30 | 51.49 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.29 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement