Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSZIX vs RNWHX
FSZIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSZIX vs RNWHX
FSZIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSZIX (39.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSZIX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FSZIX (0.79). FSZIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSZIX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSZIX (3.78) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSZIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSZIX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.79 vs. RNWHX (23.67).
| FSZIX | RNWHX | FSZIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.78 | 0.72 | 525% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.913 | 16.556 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.15 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.79 | 23.67 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.58 | 51.93 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 17.31 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers