RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FSZZX (43.8M). FSZZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FSZZX (0.82) vs RNWBX (0.41). FSZZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FSZZX (5 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FSZZX (3.86) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). FSZZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FSZZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FSZZX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FSZZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.38 vs. RNWBX (13.10).

	FSZZX	RNWBX	FSZZX / RNWBX
Total Expense Ratio	1.10	1.66	66%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	3.86	1.66	233%
Fund Existence	5 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	23.942	14.708	163%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	43.8M	90B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.82	0.41	198%
Returns for 1 year	29.38	13.10	224%
Returns for 3 years	94.99	49.07	194%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	12.94	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	98.10	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
MNHCX	26.47	N/A	N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
FCGSX	33.98	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Series Growth Company
TQVAX	22.94	N/A	N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated US LCV Eq Adv
CMSHX	38.06	-0.05	-0.13%
Columbia Small Cap Growth S
OANGX	41.35	-0.36	-0.86%
Oakmark Global Institutional