Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSZZX vs RNWHX
FSZZX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSZZX vs RNWHX
FSZZX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSZZX (39.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSZZX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FSZZX (0.80). FSZZX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSZZX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSZZX (3.86) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSZZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSZZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSZZX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSZZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.11 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| FSZZX | RNWHX | FSZZX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.86 | 0.72 | 536% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.387 | 18.743 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.11 | 31.15 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.06 | 57.37 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers