RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FSZZX (42.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSZZX: RNWHX (1.17) vs FSZZX (0.85). FSZZX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSZZX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSZZX (3.86) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSZZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSZZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSZZX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSZZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.88 vs. RNWHX (21.36).

	FSZZX	RNWHX	FSZZX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	1.10	0.72	153%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	3.86	0.72	536%
Fund Existence	5 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	25.635	17.013	151%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	42.4M	88.6B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.85	1.17	72%
Returns for 1 year	40.88	21.36	191%
Returns for 3 years	96.39	54.76	176%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	19.30	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	109.70	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FOCPX	30.34	N/A	N/A
Fidelity OTC
SMVZX	14.05	N/A	N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6
LSVGX	21.70	N/A	N/A
LSV Global Value Institutional
HWMZX	73.65	N/A	N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
HFYCX	16.25	-0.04	-0.25%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C