| FT | SFTY | FT / SFTY | |
| Gain YTD | 2.071 | 14.035 | 15% |
| Net Assets | 218M | 782M | 28% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.77 | - |
| Turnover | 21.76 | 23.00 | 95% |
| Yield | 3.92 | 0.17 | 2,286% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 1 year | - |
| FT | SFTY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 22 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FT has been loosely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FT jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFTY and LLY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFTY and LLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFTY | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| LLY - SFTY | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| MSFT - SFTY | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| AMZN - SFTY | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| AAPL - SFTY | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
| GOOGL - SFTY | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||