Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAAX vs HBLCX
FTAAX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTAAX vs HBLCX
FTAAX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAAX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAAX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FTAAX (2.26B). HBLCX (2.47) and FTAAX (2.45) have matching dividends . FTAAX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTAAX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FTAAX (0.80). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTAAX (24.00). FTAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTAAX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTAAX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTAAX (500). FTAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. HBLCX (4.05). FTAAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.82 vs. HBLCX (1.87).
| FTAAX | HBLCX | FTAAX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.65 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.65 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.693 | 3.951 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 11.1B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.47 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 4.05 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.67 | 15.85 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.82 | 1.87 | 954% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.39 | 28.44 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement