Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAWX vs RBBAX
FTAWX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts FTAWX vs RBBAX
FTAWX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAWX vs. RBBAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAWX is a StrongBuy and RBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. RBBAX (834M). RBBAX pays higher dividends than FTAWX: RBBAX (3.92) vs FTAWX (2.75). FTAWX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: FTAWX (20 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). RBBAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTAWX (0.78). FTAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBAX (12.00). FTAWX initial investment is less costly to investors than RBBAX (5%) vs RBBAX (5%). FTAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: FTAWX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTAWX: RBBAX (1000) vs FTAWX (500). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. FTAWX (9.25). RBBAX (14.40) and FTAWX (13.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTAWX | RBBAX | FTAWX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.96 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.96 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.286 | 4.755 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 834M | 758% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 3.92 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | 10.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.35 | 28.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 14.40 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.68 | 53.25 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement