Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAWX vs RBBAX
FTAWX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts FTAWX vs RBBAX
FTAWX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAWX vs. RBBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAWX is a Hold and RBBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. RBBAX (836M). RBBAX pays higher dividends than FTAWX: RBBAX (3.92) vs FTAWX (2.76). FTAWX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: FTAWX (20 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). RBBAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTAWX (0.78). FTAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBAX (12.00). FTAWX initial investment is less costly to investors than RBBAX (5%) vs RBBAX (5%). FTAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: FTAWX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTAWX: RBBAX (1000) vs FTAWX (500). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FTAWX (10.33). FTAWX return over 5 years is better than : 14.53 vs. RBBAX (12.97).
| FTAWX | RBBAX | FTAWX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.96 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.96 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.378 | 4.516 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 836M | 756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 3.92 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.33 | 11.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.49 | 30.05 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.53 | 12.97 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.17 | 56.54 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement