Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs GTFBX
FTAZX vs GTFBX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs GTFBX
FTAZX vs GTFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. GTFBX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and GTFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 581M vs. GTFBX (550M). GTFBX pays higher dividends than FTAZX: GTFBX (3.68) vs FTAZX (3.49). FTAZX was incepted earlier than GTFBX: FTAZX (39 years) vs GTFBX (33 years). FTAZX (0.68) is less costly to investors than GTFBX (0.61). FTAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.42 vs. GTFBX (16.00). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTFBX: FTAZX (1000) vs GTFBX (2500). GTFBX (4.28) and FTAZX (4.16) have marching annual gain over last year. GTFBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.79 vs. FTAZX (-2.34).
| FTAZX | GTFBX | FTAZX / GTFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.56 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.61 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.366 | -0.084 | 437% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 581M | 550M | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.68 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 4.28 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 11.64 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.34 | 2.79 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.68 | 12.55 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement