Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs GTFBX
FTAZX vs GTFBX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs GTFBX
FTAZX vs GTFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. GTFBX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and GTFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 608M vs. GTFBX (565M). GTFBX pays higher dividends than FTAZX: GTFBX (3.55) vs FTAZX (3.37). FTAZX was incepted earlier than GTFBX: FTAZX (39 years) vs GTFBX (33 years). FTAZX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GTFBX (0.61). FTAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.42 vs. GTFBX (16.00). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTFBX: FTAZX (1000) vs GTFBX (2500). GTFBX (7.69) and FTAZX (7.67) have marching annual gain over last year. GTFBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.94 vs. FTAZX (0.74).
| FTAZX | GTFBX | FTAZX / GTFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.56 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.61 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.485 | 2.627 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 608M | 565M | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.55 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 7.69 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 13.65 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.74 | 5.94 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.01 | 15.27 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement