Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs MBGAX
FTAZX vs MBGAX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs MBGAX
FTAZX vs MBGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. MBGAX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and MBGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 608M vs. MBGAX (137M). FTAZX pays higher dividends than MBGAX: FTAZX (3.37) vs MBGAX (2.45). FTAZX was incepted earlier than MBGAX: FTAZX (39 years) vs MBGAX (33 years). MBGAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.67). FTAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.42 vs. MBGAX (13.00). FTAZX (1000) and MBGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. MBGAX (6.92). FTAZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. MBGAX (-0.50).
| FTAZX | MBGAX | FTAZX / MBGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.74 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.485 | 2.135 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 608M | 137M | 444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 2.45 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 6.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 9.28 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.74 | -0.50 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.01 | 6.85 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement