Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTBFX vs PDBZX
FTBFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FTBFX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
Price$9.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.92B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.86
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.63B
FTBFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTBFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. FTBFX (38.9B). PDBZX (4.65) and FTBFX (4.49) have matching dividends . FTBFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FTBFX (23 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FTBFX (0.44). FTBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FTBFX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTBFX (4.45) and PDBZX (4.41) have marching annual gain over last year. FTBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.66 vs. PDBZX (-1.43).
| FTBFX | PDBZX | FTBFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.49 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.50 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 2.455 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.9B | 48.6B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 4.65 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 4.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 10.22 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.66 | -1.43 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.87 | 19.52 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement