Ad is loading...
FTBFX vs PDBZX
FTBFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FTBFX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
Price$9.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.85B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.83
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.44B
FTBFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTBFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.4B vs. FTBFX (38.9B). PDBZX (4.64) and FTBFX (4.44) have matching dividends . FTBFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FTBFX (23 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FTBFX (0.44). FTBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FTBFX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX (6.32) and FTBFX (6.05) have marching annual gain over last year. FTBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.77 vs. PDBZX (0.69).
| FTBFX | PDBZX | FTBFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.49 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.50 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.957 | 0.968 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.9B | 48.4B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 4.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 6.32 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.10 | 4.79 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.77 | 0.69 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.03 | 15.43 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers