Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCOX vs RGSFX
FTCOX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGSFX
FTCOX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGSFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. FTCOX (1.03B). RGSFX (0.49) and FTCOX (0.47) have matching dividends . FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: FTCOX (23 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). FTCOX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). FTCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.28 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGSFX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. FTCOX (0.11). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.64 vs. FTCOX (-0.14).
| FTCOX | RGSFX | FTCOX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.51 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.51 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.434 | 9.248 | -48% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 28.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.11 | 12.85 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.21 | 51.94 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.14 | 24.64 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.70 | 113.98 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement