Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs MDY
FTDS vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs MDY
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$54.54
Change+$0.25 (+0.46%)
Volume$200
Net Assets24.3M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$578.04
Change+$0.85 (+0.15%)
Volume$12.18K
Net Assets22.33B
FTDS vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. MDY commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 22.3B vs. FTDS (24.3M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: FTDS (8.744) vs MDY (2.186). FTDS was incepted earlier than MDY: FTDS (19 years) vs MDY (31 years). MDY (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover MDY (20.43) vs MDY (20.43).
| FTDS | MDY | FTDS / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 8.744 | 2.186 | 400% |
| Net Assets | 24.3M | 22.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.24 | 292% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 20.43 | 509% |
| Yield | 1.84 | 1.15 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 31 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PFG - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CBSH - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||