Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs MDY
FTDS vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs MDY
FTDS vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. MDY commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 26B vs. FTDS (39.1M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: FTDS (16.763) vs MDY (13.056). FTDS was incepted earlier than MDY: FTDS (20 years) vs MDY (31 years). MDY (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover MDY (15.77) vs MDY (15.77).
| FTDS | MDY | FTDS / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 16.763 | 13.056 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 26B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.23 | 304% |
| Turnover | 132.00 | 15.77 | 837% |
| Yield | 1.49 | 1.02 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 31 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| PFG - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CBSH - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| ZION - FTDS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| DOW - FTDS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with KMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then KMT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y