Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs JQLCX
FTDWX vs JQLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs JQLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FTDWX vs JQLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. JQLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and JQLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. JQLCX (1.59B). JQLCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: JQLCX (3.57) vs FTDWX (2.67). FTDWX was incepted earlier than JQLCX: FTDWX (19 years) vs JQLCX (14 years). JQLCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). FTDWX (0) and JQLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JQLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. FTDWX (5.98). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.61 vs. JQLCX (8.75).
| FTDWX | JQLCX | FTDWX / JQLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.508 | 6.847 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 1.59B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 3.57 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 6.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.64 | 19.03 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 8.75 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.55 | 25.70 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers