Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs JQLCX
FTDWX vs JQLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs JQLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57B
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.27
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
FTDWX vs JQLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. JQLCX commentary
Oct 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and JQLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.57B vs. JQLCX (1.58B). JQLCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: JQLCX (3.59) vs FTDWX (2.64). FTDWX was incepted earlier than JQLCX: FTDWX (19 years) vs JQLCX (14 years). JQLCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). FTDWX (0) and JQLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX (6.73) and JQLCX (6.60) have marching annual gain over last year. FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 12.22 vs. JQLCX (9.05).
| FTDWX | JQLCX | FTDWX / JQLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.637 | 7.562 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 1.58B | 353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 6.60 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 25.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.22 | 9.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.27 | 26.10 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement