Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs JQLCX
FTDWX vs JQLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs JQLCX
FTDWX vs JQLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. JQLCX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Hold and JQLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. JQLCX (1.52B). JQLCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: JQLCX (3.40) vs FTDWX (2.55). FTDWX was incepted earlier than JQLCX: FTDWX (20 years) vs JQLCX (14 years). JQLCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.03). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JQLCX (15.00). FTDWX (0) and JQLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. JQLCX (8.72). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 13.10 vs. JQLCX (7.74).
| FTDWX | JQLCX | FTDWX / JQLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.31 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.31 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.147 | 3.236 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 1.52B | 417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 8.72 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.54 | 24.55 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.10 | 7.74 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.68 | 32.28 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement