Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs RBBAX
FTDWX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs RBBAX
FTDWX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. RBBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Hold and RBBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. RBBAX (836M). RBBAX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: RBBAX (3.92) vs FTDWX (2.55). FTDWX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: FTDWX (20 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). FTDWX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RBBAX (0.96). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBAX (12.00). RBBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTDWX (4%) vs FTDWX (4%). FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: FTDWX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTDWX: RBBAX (1000) vs FTDWX (500). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FTDWX (10.03). FTDWX (13.10) and RBBAX (12.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTDWX | RBBAX | FTDWX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.96 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.96 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.147 | 4.516 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 836M | 756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.92 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 11.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.54 | 30.05 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.10 | 12.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.68 | 56.54 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement