Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs RBBCX
FTDWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs RBBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Columbia Income Builder C
Price$12.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.12M
FTDWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and RBBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. RBBCX (844M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: RBBCX (3.00) vs FTDWX (2.70). FTDWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTDWX (19 years) vs RBBCX (19 years). RBBCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBBCX (18.00). FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTDWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTDWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTDWX (500). RBBCX (6.99) and FTDWX (6.74) have marching annual gain over last year. RBBCX (10.70) and FTDWX (10.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTDWX | RBBCX | FTDWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.72 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.72 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.245 | 5.747 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 844M | 651% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.00 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 6.99 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.23 | 13.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.18 | 10.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.04 | 35.74 | 64% |