Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs RBBCX
FTDWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs RBBCX
FTDWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and RBBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 6.27B vs. RBBCX (821M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: RBBCX (3.18) vs FTDWX (2.51). FTDWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTDWX (20 years) vs RBBCX (20 years). RBBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.03). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBCX (12.00). FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTDWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTDWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTDWX (500). RBBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. FTDWX (7.97). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.48 vs. RBBCX (9.47).
| FTDWX | RBBCX | FTDWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.71 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.71 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.547 | 3.878 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 821M | 764% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 3.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 9.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.01 | 24.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.48 | 9.47 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.63 | 42.67 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement