Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs RBBCX
FTDWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs RBBCX
FTDWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Hold and RBBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. RBBCX (836M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: RBBCX (3.17) vs FTDWX (2.55). FTDWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTDWX (20 years) vs RBBCX (20 years). RBBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.03). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBCX (12.00). FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTDWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTDWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTDWX (500). RBBCX (10.50) and FTDWX (10.03) have marching annual gain over last year. FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 13.10 vs. RBBCX (8.75).
| FTDWX | RBBCX | FTDWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.71 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.71 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.147 | 4.172 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 836M | 756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 10.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.54 | 27.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.10 | 8.75 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.68 | 46.07 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers