Ad is loading...
FTEC vs SHOC
FTEC vs SHOC Comparison
Open Charts FTEC vs SHOC
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
Price$143.44
Change-$8.68 (-5.71%)
Volume$150
Net Assets11.58B
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$34.25
Change-$2.42 (-6.60%)
Volume$100
Net Assets70.26M
FTEC vs SHOC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTEC vs. SHOC commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and SHOC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 11.6B vs. SHOC (70.3M). FTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than SHOC: FTEC (-17.606) vs SHOC (-20.079). FTEC was incepted earlier than SHOC: FTEC (11 years) vs SHOC (3 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover FTEC (10.00) vs FTEC (10.00).
| FTEC | SHOC | FTEC / SHOC | |
| Gain YTD | -17.606 | -20.079 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 70.3M | 16,501% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.40 | 21% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 29.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.33 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTEC | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | -7.23% | ||
| KLAC - FTEC | 81% Closely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| LRCX - FTEC | 81% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| CDNS - FTEC | 80% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| AMAT - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| SNPS - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
More | ||||
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -8.73% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | -20.93% | ||
More | ||||