Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTEQX vs RNWHX
FTEQX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FTEQX vs RNWHX
FTEQX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTEQX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEQX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FTEQX (324M). FTEQX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FTEQX (1.25) vs RNWHX (1.14). FTEQX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FTEQX (9 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FTEQX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTEQX (16.75). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTEQX: RNWHX (250) vs FTEQX (1000000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.47 vs. FTEQX (13.59). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.04 vs. FTEQX (10.11).
| FTEQX | RNWHX | FTEQX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.72 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.020 | 12.651 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.14 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 19.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 43.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.11 | 14.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement