Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTESX vs RNWHX
FTESX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FTESX vs RNWHX
FTESX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTESX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTESX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FTESX (328M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FTESX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FTESX (0.94). FTESX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FTESX (20 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FTESX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTESX (16.75). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTESX: RNWHX (250) vs FTESX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.15 vs. FTESX (18.07). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. FTESX (9.34).
| FTESX | RNWHX | FTESX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.72 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.489 | 18.743 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.07 | 31.15 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.14 | 57.37 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.34 | 20.21 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.99 | 132.48 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement