Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs TCCAX
FTFQX vs TCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs TCCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FTFQX vs TCCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. TCCAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and TCCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. TCCAX (518M). FTFQX pays higher dividends than TCCAX: FTFQX (3.59) vs TCCAX (2.86). FTFQX was incepted earlier than TCCAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs TCCAX (26 years). TCCAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). TCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX (1000) and TCCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.28 vs. TCCAX (-2.94). TCCAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.52 vs. FTFQX (-4.36).
| FTFQX | TCCAX | FTFQX / TCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.49 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.76 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.358 | -4.029 | 59% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 518M | 2,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 2.86 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | -2.94 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.69 | 5.88 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.36 | -0.52 | 837% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement