Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGAX vs MSNCX
FTGAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FTGAX vs MSNCX
FTGAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 557M vs. FTGAX (256M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FTGAX: MSNCX (3.41) vs FTGAX (3.24). FTGAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FTGAX (39 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTGAX (0.77). FTGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.73 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTGAX (4%) vs FTGAX (4%). FTGAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. MSNCX (4.10). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FTGAX (-3.22).
| FTGAX | MSNCX | FTGAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.86 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.237 | -0.492 | 48% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 557M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 3.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 4.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.15 | 10.16 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.22 | 0.15 | -2,133% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.73 | 11.59 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement