Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGAX vs MSNCX
FTGAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FTGAX vs MSNCX
FTGAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. FTGAX (264M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FTGAX: MSNCX (3.29) vs FTGAX (3.11). FTGAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FTGAX (39 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTGAX (0.75). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FTGAX (10.73). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTGAX (4%) vs FTGAX (4%). FTGAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX (8.08) and FTGAX (7.96) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.22 vs. FTGAX (-0.72).
| FTGAX | MSNCX | FTGAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.86 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.887 | 2.032 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 570M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 3.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 8.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.17 | 11.55 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.72 | 3.22 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.17 | 15.65 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement