Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGAX vs MSNCX
FTGAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FTGAX vs MSNCX
FTGAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. FTGAX (265M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FTGAX: MSNCX (3.29) vs FTGAX (3.11). FTGAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FTGAX (39 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTGAX (0.75). FTGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.73 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTGAX (4%) vs FTGAX (4%). FTGAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX (7.54) and FTGAX (7.34) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FTGAX (-0.38).
| FTGAX | MSNCX | FTGAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.86 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.459 | 2.595 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 578M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 3.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 7.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.42 | 12.01 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.38 | 3.55 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.44 | 14.93 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement