FTHF
Price
$50.20
Change
+$1.28 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
132.52M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IEMG
Price
$82.17
Change
+$0.72 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
158.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTHF vs IEMG

FTHF vs IEMG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) vs. iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) employs a thematic strategy targeting emerging market companies aligned with human flourishing metrics, resulting in a concentrated portfolio of approximately 109 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.75%.
  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) provides broad passive exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap equities across emerging markets via the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, maintaining over 2,600 holdings and a low expense ratio of 0.09%.
  • FTHF exhibits greater sector concentration, with significant allocations to technology and financial services, while IEMG offers diversified representation across multiple emerging market economies and sectors.
  • Structural differences position FTHF as a higher-cost, actively screened thematic option suited for investors seeking specific values-based exposure, whereas IEMG serves as a cost-efficient core holding for broad emerging markets allocation.
  • Liquidity and scale favor IEMG substantially due to its multi-billion-dollar assets under management compared to FTHF's smaller size, influencing trading efficiency and tracking precision over market cycles.
  • Both ETFs share emerging markets exposure but diverge in risk profiles, with FTHF's thematic focus potentially introducing higher volatility tied to its selection criteria versus IEMG's market-cap-weighted breadth.

Introduction

Investors seeking emerging markets exposure face a choice between broad market representation and specialized thematic approaches. First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) both target equities from developing economies but pursue distinct strategies. They do not compete directly; instead, they offer complementary or alternative paths to similar investor goals of growth through emerging market participation. FTHF emphasizes companies promoting human flourishing, while IEMG delivers comprehensive market-cap-weighted coverage. This comparison highlights their structural differences to aid informed allocation decisions in the current environment of evolving global trade dynamics and sector rotations.

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) Overview

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) tracks a custom index designed to measure the performance of large- and mid-cap companies in emerging markets that sufficiently promote human flourishing, based on criteria including human rights, environmental stewardship, and governance practices. The fund holds approximately 109 securities and maintains a market-cap-weighted approach within its screened universe. Top holdings reflect this thematic filter, often including technology and materials firms aligned with the index methodology. Sector allocations tilt heavily toward technology (around 50%) and financial services (around 24%), with additional exposure to basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As a passively managed thematic ETF launched in late 2023, it features periodic index rebalancing and targets 80% or more of assets in index constituents. Distinguishing features include its values-oriented screening and relatively concentrated profile compared to broad benchmarks.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) Overview

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, providing exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from emerging markets worldwide. The fund holds over 2,600 securities, ensuring broad diversification across countries and companies. Top holdings typically include major technology names such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, alongside other leaders in consumer and financial sectors. Sector allocations span technology, financials, consumer discretionary, and communication services in proportions mirroring the underlying index. The expense ratio is 0.09%. As a passively managed ETF, it employs full replication where feasible with quarterly rebalancing aligned to index changes. Key structural characteristics include its scale, with assets exceeding $165 billion, high liquidity, and low-cost structure that supports efficient long-term emerging markets exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets equities continue to attract attention amid global supply chain shifts, technological advancement in Asia, and varying monetary policies across developing economies. Capital flows respond to interest rate differentials, commodity price trends, and geopolitical developments affecting trade relationships. Regulatory changes in key markets, including technology export controls and financial sector reforms, influence sector performance. Broader macroeconomic drivers such as inflation moderation and infrastructure spending create both opportunities and risks for emerging market companies. Thematic strategies focused on governance and sustainability factors gain traction among investors prioritizing long-term resilience, while broad market ETFs benefit from overall economic expansion in regions like Asia and Latin America. Sector risks include currency volatility and policy uncertainty that can affect relative performance across different exposure styles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has shown sensitivity to its thematic screens, with performance influenced by strength in technology and materials sectors amid earnings cycles and innovation trends. Its concentrated holdings can lead to higher volatility during sector rotations compared to broader benchmarks. iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG), by contrast, has delivered more stable relative positioning through diversified exposure, benefiting from broad participation in large-cap leaders during periods of emerging market recovery. Interest rate expectations and geopolitical factors have driven capital allocation differences, with IEMG's scale supporting tighter tracking and lower trading costs. FTHF's higher expense ratio and thematic tilt position it for potential outperformance in environments favoring screened companies, while IEMG's low cost and breadth favor consistent exposure across varying macro conditions. Relative volatility remains higher for the thematic fund due to fewer holdings and specific selection criteria.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing ETFs like First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) may find the tool useful for uncovering additional ideas aligned with their criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) with higher probability due to its superior cost efficiency, extensive diversification across thousands of holdings, robust liquidity profile, and proven structural consistency in delivering broad emerging markets exposure. While First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) offers differentiated thematic positioning that may appeal in specific environments, IEMG's lower expense ratio and scale provide stronger risk-adjusted characteristics across observed market cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTHF vs. IEMG commentary
Jun 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a StrongBuy and IEMG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEMG has more net assets: 158B vs. FTHF (133M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than IEMG: FTHF (52.921) vs IEMG (23.223). FTHF was incepted earlier than IEMG: FTHF (3 years) vs IEMG (14 years). IEMG (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover IEMG (6.00) vs IEMG (6.00).
FTHFIEMGFTHF / IEMG
Gain YTD52.92123.223228%
Net Assets133M158B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.09833%
Turnover38.006.00633%
Yield1.952.2188%
Fund Existence3 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTHFIEMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOVYX26.450.14
+0.53%
American Beacon IMC Int Small Cap Y
PEIOX44.24N/A
N/A
Principal Equity Income R3
POIRX14.07N/A
N/A
Polen International Growth Investor
CLVRX41.20N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx R6
PURYX62.43-0.14
-0.22%
Putnam U.S. Research Y

FTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with GFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then GFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTHF
1D Price
Change %
FTHF100%
+3.18%
GFI - FTHF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
CLS - FTHF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
ABG - FTHF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
OUT - FTHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
SLM - FTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
More

IEMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEMG
1D Price
Change %
IEMG100%
+0.88%
BABA - IEMG
75%
Closely correlated
-4.74%
JD - IEMG
69%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
BILI - IEMG
68%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
BIDU - IEMG
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.55%
BZUN - IEMG
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.17%
More