Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCASX
FTHFX vs GCASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCASX
FTHFX vs GCASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCASX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCASX (1.77B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCASX: FTHFX (0.56) vs GCASX (0.24). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCASX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCASX (23 years). GCASX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. GCASX (1.00). GCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. GCASX (4.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. GCASX (0.26).
| FTHFX | GCASX | FTHFX / GCASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 9.778 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.77B | 682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.24 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 4.91 | 311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 20.39 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 0.26 | 23,113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 2.58 | 9,200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers