Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCASX
FTHFX vs GCASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCASX
FTHFX vs GCASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCASX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCASX (1.85B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCASX: FTHFX (0.57) vs GCASX (0.23). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCASX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCASX (23 years). GCASX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. GCASX (1.00). GCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. GCASX (14.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. GCASX (3.54).
| FTHFX | GCASX | FTHFX / GCASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.38 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 12.749 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.85B | 654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.23 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 14.14 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 16.79 | 329% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | 3.54 | 1,853% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 4.12 | 5,613% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement