Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$28.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.74M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GCSAX (502M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.75) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. GCSAX (-6.52). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. GCSAX (8.60).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 7.932 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 502M | 2,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.75 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -6.52 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 31.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 8.60 | 921% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 49.09 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers