Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.19
Change-$0.19 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.69B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$26.05
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.16M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. GCSAX (453M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.83) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. GCSAX (-1.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.53 vs. GCSAX (10.62).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.315 | 0.616 | 700% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 453M | 2,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.83 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | -1.34 | -530% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 17.62 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.53 | 10.62 | 814% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.10 | 37.55 | 397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers