Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$25.17
Change+$0.44 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets424.73M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and GCSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. GCSAX (425M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.88) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. GCSAX (-5.28). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. GCSAX (8.86).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -4.775 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 425M | 2,353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.88 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -5.28 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 9.38 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | 8.86 | 903% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | 28.14 | 487% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement