Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.79
Change+$0.81 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$29.60
Change+$0.69 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.31M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. GCSAX (519M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.77) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.97 vs. GCSAX (0.85). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 108.15 vs. GCSAX (27.04).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.040 | 11.321 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 519M | 2,177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.77 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.97 | 0.85 | 466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.81 | 39.70 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.15 | 27.04 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.62 | 59.67 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers