Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.79B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$23.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets407.93M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.79B vs. GCSAX (408M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.93) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.88 vs. GCSAX (-10.41). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.29 vs. GCSAX (17.42).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.196 | -8.702 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.79B | 408M | 2,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.93 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | -10.41 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 15.40 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.29 | 17.42 | 564% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.97 | 23.17 | 557% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...