Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$21.88
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.57M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.27B vs. GCSAX (379M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.91) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.90 vs. GCSAX (-14.04). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.37 vs. GCSAX (18.69).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.735 | -16.827 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.27B | 379M | 2,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.90 | -14.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.86 | -6.45 | -308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.37 | 18.69 | 537% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.54 | 10.47 | 750% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...