Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSAX (1.1B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSAX: FTHFX (0.56) vs GCSAX (0.33). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSAX (29 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. GCSAX (12.39). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. GCSAX (-1.75).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.21 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.29 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 20.422 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.1B | 1,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.33 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 12.39 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 46.11 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -1.75 | -3,485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 66.95 | 354% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement