Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.42
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.1B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
Price$18.81
Change-$0.11 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.23M
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and GCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. GCSCX (435M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs GCSCX (0.53). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSCX (28 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.80 vs. GCSCX (-7.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.39 vs. GCSCX (5.16).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.312 | -2.625 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 435M | 2,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.53 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | -7.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.99 | 19.27 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.39 | 5.16 | 1,867% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.11 | 8.58 | 1,597% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement