Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
Price$20.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.74M
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GCSCX (502M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GCSCX (0.45). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSCX (28 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. GCSCX (-10.49). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. GCSCX (-5.53).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 7.205 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 502M | 2,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.45 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -10.49 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 24.15 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -5.53 | -1,433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 23.86 | 670% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers