Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.63 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
Price$17.77
Change+$0.27 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.91M
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.82B vs. GCSCX (389M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs GCSCX (0.54). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSCX (28 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.00 vs. GCSCX (-13.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. GCSCX (26.77).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -9.933 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 389M | 2,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.54 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -13.70 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | -8.16 | -291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | 26.77 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | -1.81 | -4,993% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...