Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSCX (1.12B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs GCSCX (0.03). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSCX (29 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.34 vs. GCSCX (14.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.53 vs. GCSCX (-18.10).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.96 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.526 | 22.982 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.12B | 1,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.03 | 1,880% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.34 | 14.83 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | 32.06 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.53 | -18.10 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 233.87 | 33.45 | 699% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement