Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSCX (1.07B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs GCSCX (0.03). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSCX (29 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.43 vs. GCSCX (20.15). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.04 vs. GCSCX (-13.07).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.96 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.411 | 26.581 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.07B | 1,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.03 | 1,834% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.43 | 20.15 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.35 | 36.22 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.04 | -13.07 | -513% |
| Returns for 10 years | 247.39 | 39.05 | 633% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement