Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSIX
FTHFX vs GCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSIX
FTHFX vs GCSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSIX (1.12B). FTHFX (0.56) and GCSIX (0.56) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSIX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSIX (29 years). GCSIX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and GCSIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GCSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.36 vs. FTHFX (24.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. GCSIX (10.39).
| FTHFX | GCSIX | FTHFX / GCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 26.527 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.12B | 1,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 28.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 57.15 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 10.39 | 648% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 82.52 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers