Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSIX
FTHFX vs GCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSIX
FTHFX vs GCSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSIX (1.1B). FTHFX (0.56) and GCSIX (0.55) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSIX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSIX (29 years). GCSIX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and GCSIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. GCSIX (13.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. GCSIX (2.95).
| FTHFX | GCSIX | FTHFX / GCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 20.728 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.1B | 1,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.55 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 13.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 49.76 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 2.95 | 2,068% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 78.18 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers