Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSSX
FTHFX vs GCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSSX
FTHFX vs GCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSSX (1.1B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSSX: FTHFX (0.56) vs GCSSX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSSX (29 years). GCSSX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. GCSSX (11.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. GCSSX (-3.68).
| FTHFX | GCSSX | FTHFX / GCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.43 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 20.321 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.1B | 1,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.29 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 11.91 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 44.58 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -3.68 | -1,656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 62.59 | 379% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement