Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSSX
FTHFX vs GCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSSX
FTHFX vs GCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSSX commentary
Jul 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GCSSX (1.01B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSSX: FTHFX (0.57) vs GCSSX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GCSSX (29 years). GCSSX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.69 vs. GCSSX (25.35). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. GCSSX (-1.57).
| FTHFX | GCSSX | FTHFX / GCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.43 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.803 | 21.814 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.01B | 1,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.29 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.69 | 25.35 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.69 | 38.11 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | -1.57 | -4,241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.68 | 63.53 | 377% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement