Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.20
Change+$0.37 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.64B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$20.19
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.45M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GMSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. GMSMX (99.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.76) vs GMSMX (0.41). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.54 vs. GMSMX (4.61). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.31 vs. GMSMX (48.45).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.356 | 2.504 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 99.5M | 10,653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.41 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 4.61 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.27 | 22.76 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.31 | 48.45 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.58 | 18.51 | 797% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers