Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$20.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.82M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GMSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GMSMX (91.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GMSMX (0.39). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. GMSMX (-8.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. GMSMX (18.73).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 2.570 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 91.8M | 11,765% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.39 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -8.12 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 16.51 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 18.73 | 423% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 29.11 | 549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers