Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$20.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.3M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GMSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. GMSMX (95.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.69) vs GMSMX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.45 vs. GMSMX (-3.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.77 vs. GMSMX (30.73).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.322 | 5.381 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 95.3M | 11,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.38 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.45 | -3.91 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.48 | 27.58 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.77 | 30.73 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.01 | 32.73 | 513% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement