Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$17.19
Change-$1.23 (-6.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.75M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GMSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. GMSMX (91.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.82) vs GMSMX (0.44). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (16.37). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.00 vs. GMSMX (-8.57). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. GMSMX (86.07).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -7.117 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 91.7M | 10,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.44 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -8.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | -5.04 | -471% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | 86.07 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | 6.45 | 1,398% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...