Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GMSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GMSMX (100M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.57) vs GMSMX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GMSMX (25 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GMSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. GMSMX (20.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. GMSMX (12.15).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 20.439 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 100M | 12,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.29 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 20.78 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 34.70 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | 12.15 | 540% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 52.69 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers