Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GMSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. GMSMX (99.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.59) vs GMSMX (0.31). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GMSMX (25 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. GMSMX (24.41). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. GMSMX (7.76).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 18.374 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 99.7M | 11,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 24.41 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 40.44 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 7.76 | 795% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 60.07 | 414% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement