Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GQSCX (3.85M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.57) vs GQSCX (0.31). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GQSCX (9 years). GQSCX (3.77) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.36 vs. FTHFX (25.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.82 vs. GQSCX (31.08).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 3.77 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.958 | 23.751 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 3.85M | 314,041% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.31 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.81 | 38.36 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.42 | 54.40 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.82 | 31.08 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers