Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. GQSCX (5.49M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs GQSCX (0.45). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GQSCX (9 years). GQSCX (3.77) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.47 vs. FTHFX (24.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. GQSCX (43.04).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 3.77 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 29.455 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 5.49M | 220,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.45 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 42.47 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 62.86 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 43.04 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement