Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. GQSCX (3.58M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs GQSCX (0.33). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs GQSCX (9 years). GQSCX (3.77) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.08 vs. FTHFX (27.20). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.56 vs. GQSCX (21.60).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 3.77 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.709 | 14.796 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 3.58M | 313,112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.33 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.20 | 37.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.18 | 49.81 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.56 | 21.60 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 240.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers