Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs KCSIX
FTHFX vs KCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs KCSIX
FTHFX vs KCSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. KCSIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and KCSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. KCSIX (210M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than KCSIX: FTHFX (0.59) vs KCSIX (0.43). FTHFX was incepted earlier than KCSIX: FTHFX (15 years) vs KCSIX (11 years). KCSIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). KCSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). KCSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: KCSIX (25000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. KCSIX (28.04). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. KCSIX (11.38).
| FTHFX | KCSIX | FTHFX / KCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 21.184 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 25000 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 210M | 5,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.43 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 28.04 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 42.11 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 11.38 | 542% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 78.82 | 315% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement