Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs KCSSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Knights of Columbus Small Cap S
Price$12.09
Change+$0.19 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.11M
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. KCSSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and KCSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. KCSSX (144M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than KCSSX: FTHFX (0.82) vs KCSSX (0.48). FTHFX was incepted earlier than KCSSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs KCSSX (10 years). KCSSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). KCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). KCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: KCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. KCSSX (-6.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. KCSSX (41.31).
| FTHFX | KCSSX | FTHFX / KCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -9.158 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 144M | 6,738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.48 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -6.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | 9.83 | 345% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 41.31 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers