Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. KCSSX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and KCSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. KCSSX (210M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than KCSSX: FTHFX (0.57) vs KCSSX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than KCSSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs KCSSX (11 years). KCSSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). KCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). KCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: KCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.73 vs. KCSSX (21.38). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.11 vs. KCSSX (12.72).
| FTHFX | KCSSX | FTHFX / KCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.00 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.00 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.669 | 20.371 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 210M | 5,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.73 | 21.38 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.98 | 30.63 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.11 | 12.72 | 520% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.39 | 65.09 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers