Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. KCSSX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and KCSSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. KCSSX (211M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than KCSSX: FTHFX (0.56) vs KCSSX (0.42). FTHFX was incepted earlier than KCSSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs KCSSX (11 years). KCSSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). KCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). KCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: KCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.08 vs. KCSSX (15.39). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 63.08 vs. KCSSX (10.46).
| FTHFX | KCSSX | FTHFX / KCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.00 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.00 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.380 | 20.677 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 211M | 5,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.42 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.08 | 15.39 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.15 | 35.74 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.08 | 10.46 | 603% |
| Returns for 10 years | 238.48 | 65.68 | 363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers