Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LGSCX
FTHFX vs LGSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LGSCX
FTHFX vs LGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LGSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LGSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. LGSCX (147M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LGSCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs LGSCX (0.01). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LGSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LGSCX (23 years). LGSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LGSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). LGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.67 vs. FTHFX (30.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. LGSCX (4.56).
| FTHFX | LGSCX | FTHFX / LGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.30 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 16.415 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 147M | 7,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.01 | 4,455% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 32.67 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 57.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 4.56 | 1,352% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 45.76 | 543% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement