Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LGSCX
FTHFX vs LGSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LGSCX
FTHFX vs LGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LGSCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LGSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LGSCX (149M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LGSCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs LGSCX (0.01). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LGSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LGSCX (24 years). LGSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LGSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.29 vs. LGSCX (25.89). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.47 vs. LGSCX (8.50).
| FTHFX | LGSCX | FTHFX / LGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.30 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.111 | 16.631 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 149M | 8,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.01 | 4,316% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.29 | 25.89 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 44.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.47 | 8.50 | 771% |
| Returns for 10 years | 244.71 | 37.52 | 652% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers