Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMARX
FTHFX vs LMARX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMARX
FTHFX vs LMARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMARX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMARX (708M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMARX: FTHFX (0.56) vs LMARX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMARX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMARX (20 years). LMARX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMARX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. LMARX (13.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. LMARX (3.56).
| FTHFX | LMARX | FTHFX / LMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.45 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.48 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 16.264 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 708M | 1,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 13.83 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 25.40 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 3.56 | 1,889% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 45.88 | 527% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement