Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMASX (708M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.56) vs LMASX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMASX (41 years). LMASX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. LMASX (8.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. LMASX (-12.50).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.85 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 15.972 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 708M | 1,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 8.05 | 307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 14.17 | 456% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -12.50 | -538% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 10.89 | 2,219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers