Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMNSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMNSX (715M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: FTHFX (0.57) vs LMNSX (0.27). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMNSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMNSX (32 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LMNSX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. LMNSX (18.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. LMNSX (5.53).
| FTHFX | LMNSX | FTHFX / LMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.86 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 16.241 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 715M | 1,692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.27 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 18.60 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 24.37 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | 5.53 | 1,186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 63.38 | 365% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers