Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMNSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMNSX (705M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: FTHFX (0.56) vs LMNSX (0.28). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMNSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMNSX (32 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LMNSX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.29 vs. LMNSX (18.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.47 vs. LMNSX (5.17).
| FTHFX | LMNSX | FTHFX / LMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.86 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.111 | 15.611 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 705M | 1,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.28 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.29 | 18.74 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 20.97 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.47 | 5.17 | 1,266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 244.71 | 62.91 | 389% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers