Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMNSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMNSX (680M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: FTHFX (0.56) vs LMNSX (0.28). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMNSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMNSX (32 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LMNSX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. LMNSX (6.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. LMNSX (3.36).
| FTHFX | LMNSX | FTHFX / LMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.86 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 12.686 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 680M | 1,779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.28 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 6.36 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 25.35 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 3.36 | 1,813% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 58.17 | 408% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers