Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMNSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. LMNSX (730M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: FTHFX (0.59) vs LMNSX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMNSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMNSX (32 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LMNSX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. LMNSX (22.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. LMNSX (-1.34).
| FTHFX | LMNSX | FTHFX / LMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.86 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 13.174 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 730M | 1,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.29 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 22.36 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 28.17 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | -1.34 | -4,596% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 68.92 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement