Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.89
Change-$0.96 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
ClearBridge Small Cap A
Price$38.42
Change-$0.59 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.6M
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. LMSAX (712M). LMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: LMSAX (1.02) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMSAX (16 years). LMSAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMSAX (33.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. LMSAX (-2.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.46 vs. LMSAX (23.22).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.148 | -0.738 | -427% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 712M | 1,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | -2.12 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.49 | 14.28 | 333% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.46 | 23.22 | 415% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.47 | 12.33 | 1,180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement