Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
ClearBridge Small Cap A
Price$33.87
Change+$0.39 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets630.14M
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. LMSAX (630M). LMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: LMSAX (1.03) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMSAX (16 years). LMSAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMSAX (33.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. LMSAX (-9.42). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. LMSAX (25.39).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -14.809 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 630M | 1,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.03 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -9.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -15.35 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | 25.39 | 368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | -3.84 | -2,002% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...