Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMSAX (706M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: FTHFX (0.57) vs LMSAX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMSAX (17 years). LMSAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.73 vs. LMSAX (11.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.11 vs. LMSAX (-8.70).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.13 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.669 | 15.322 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 706M | 1,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.37 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.73 | 11.21 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.98 | 12.74 | 416% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.11 | -8.70 | -760% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.39 | 26.39 | 877% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers