Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LMSAX (708M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: FTHFX (0.56) vs LMSAX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LMSAX (18 years). LMSAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. LMSAX (10.28). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. LMSAX (-5.74).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.13 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 16.539 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 708M | 1,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.37 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 10.28 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 19.35 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -5.74 | -1,171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 25.78 | 937% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement